Posted by: CJ | July 16, 2010

Depressive’s Anonymous

One of  Tolstoy’s most famous quips is the opening line in Anna Karenina. Mostly because it’s a good opening for talking about unhappy people. But I’m a contrarian, so I’ll just skip that formalism and say this is a navel-gazing post about unhappy people, particularly me when I’m unhappy.

I understand my depressive issues much better now than two or three years ago. They aren’t gone or always under control, but I do understand them much better. My most recent understanding is from several conversations with a friend here.

I’ve usually thought of my depressive episodes as something that was sorta beyond my control. Just a mood that would strike and that I had to roll with. There are techniques to mitigate it, to dampen it, to put it on hold, but nothing to make it stop before it started or to make it go away once it had. And most importantly, I tended to deny that I had any real agency in kick-starting the process and keeping it going.

But now I think I’m more of a participant in how my depressive episodes, at least the minor ones, start and play out. It’s not that they’re fully outside my control, it’s that when I’m upset I abuse emotions like an alcoholic abuses alcohol or any addict abuses their addiction of choice. I’ll binge on them, wallow in self-pity, tax my friends’ patience, and occasionally use my bad mood as an excuse for doing things I know I shouldn’t do and (or so I tell myself) wouldn’t otherwise do. Eventually I’ll reach emotional equilibrium again (i.e. sober up) and then feel bad about whatever havoc I caused while I was busy being upset and try to move on with my life.

This slightly different viewpoint suggests a few things. The first is it helps me realize and accept that getting into an emotional spiral is unproductive. It takes up time, increases the chances I’ll frustrate or hurt someone I care about, and probably will decrease the quality of whatever academic work I do manage to focus on. The second is that once I’ve given into certain negative emotions, it’s largely damage-control from there on out. Stopping myself before I get started is much more important than finding ways to come out of it once it’s started. At least to help me not get into tizzies over small stuff. Bigger issues, of the sort that have historically led to successive waves of depression over several weeks or months, I’m still unsure about. Those are usually caused/worsened  by external issues that make me overly sensitive, issues that I usually can’t easily resolve or ignore. In those situations I do need coping skills that work over longer periods of time, and can help me deal if (when?) I fall off the bandwagon.

All of the above is important enough for me to realize. But my friend also had a few other comforting words of wisdom. They essentially boiled down to: Like anything else that could have a sin tax associated with it, use negative emotions responsibly. She didn’t tell me that I should only feel sad or depressed when there was a good reason to, or that I should never sit around feeling sorry for myself. She readily acknowledged that being an emotional tempest in a teapot for awhile can be quite satisfying, in it’s own way. And since she’s had her own issues with emotions over the years, I knew it wasn’t she wasn’t just being patronizing; it was the voice of empathy and understanding I was hearing.

In ways this last part was the most important part for me to hear. I’ve been told before that, to varying extents depending on the circumstances,  negative emotions are a choice. But I’ve usually been told that  by all-too-emotionally-balanced people. And, like life-long teetotalers lecturing Robert Downey Jr., it just wasn’t particularly convincing. If I didn’t believe they had an inkling what the emotions were doing for me or why I might want or need to feel them, then everything they said was suspect.

So now I have a vaguely different perspective, and a vague notion that it should help change things. I guess only time will tell how much this view really helps.



  1. I’m laughing at the characterization of all-too-emotionally- balanced people as being teetotalers lecturing Downey. I’m probably the main offender there–but point of fact, I have tried to say many of those things (in different words, albeit), but I do understand that because I’m cursed with blandness, the credos is lacking.

    Interesting, though. And you have a way with imagery and word choice. 🙂

  2. Honestly, for the all-too-emotionally-balanced people I was more thinking of various college friends or various teachers/therapists from home. Most of them had never really dealt with substance-abusers, let alone engaged them, and weren’t particularly receptive to the idea of pain as a numbing agent besides.

    Usually when I was talking to you about such things I was already in the damage control phase. At that point future safety procedures weren’t usually a topic of high interest to me.

    Like I said in the post, I’m not really claiming I’d never been told those main points before. Just that what I had been told didn’t always stick very well, and that this way of thinking about it made a bit more sense to me. One reason this particular idea feels a bit better to me is just that I’m not particularly prone to substance abuse. When I have something I’m in the middle of, I know how to tell myself that various substances won’t help and have an overwhelming probability of hindering. And even when I’m not particularly busy I avoid them because I don’t want to get dependent on them. Casting depression as more of a substance abuse problem helps me realize that whatever reasons or techniques I use to avoid even starting those substances, let alone abusing them, could/should be brought to bear on depressive issues.

    Which isn’t to say I didn’t already do that to some extent. I probably did, but I didn’t think about it this way.

  3. Actually, now that I’ve stopped to think about it more, I remember there are times you gave me helpful wisdom based in part on T.’s experiences with AA. So a lot of the stuff in this post isn’t exactly new.

  4. It’s new if it’s just now resonating with you, in a sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: